# MCP Server for AI Coding Agents – Cursor, Claude Code & More

> Connect QA.tech's vision-based testing agents to Cursor, Claude Code, and any MCP-compatible client. Run, create, and validate tests without leaving your editor.

Source: https://qa.tech/product/mcp

---
Connect QA.tech's vision-based testing agents to Cursor, Claude Code, or any MCP client.  
Your coding agent runs, creates, and validates tests without leaving the editor.

[Get a demo](https://qa.tech/demo?utm_source=mcp&utm_medium=product_page&utm_campaign=mcp_server)

Trusted by high-performing engineering teams at:

![Lovable](https://qa.tech/assets/lovable-CUy1wfYW.svg)

[Case study](https://qa.tech/case-studies/how-pricer-transform-qa-with-qa-tech)

![AstraZeneca](https://qa.tech/assets/astrazeneca-mCUUSOqn.svg)

![Upsales](https://qa.tech/assets/upsales-CwvOOTpd.svg)[Case study](https://qa.tech/case-studies/how-upsales-replaced-320h-of-manual-testing-with-agents)

![Sambla Group](https://qa.tech/assets/sambla-B_-h2G9P.svg)

![AdminPulse](https://qa.tech/assets/adminpulse-DRb0830J.svg)

![Lovable](https://qa.tech/assets/lovable-CUy1wfYW.svg)

[Case study](https://qa.tech/case-studies/how-pricer-transform-qa-with-qa-tech)

![AstraZeneca](https://qa.tech/assets/astrazeneca-mCUUSOqn.svg)

![Upsales](https://qa.tech/assets/upsales-CwvOOTpd.svg)[Case study](https://qa.tech/case-studies/how-upsales-replaced-320h-of-manual-testing-with-agents)

![Sambla Group](https://qa.tech/assets/sambla-B_-h2G9P.svg)

![AdminPulse](https://qa.tech/assets/adminpulse-DRb0830J.svg)

░█▓ ▒░█ ▓▒░ ░█▓ ▒░█ ▓▒░ ░█▓ ▒░█ ▓▒░ ░█▓ ▒░█ ▓▒░ ░█▓ ▒░█ ▓▒░ ░█▓ ▒░█

## AI doubled your engineering velocity.  
QA didn't move.

Your team writes code at agent speed. Tests still get written by hand, break on every UI change, and live one tab away from where the code happens. The MCP server closes that gap. Tests run, get created, and report back in the same editor – called by the same agent that just shipped the change.

And because QA.tech's agents see your UI the way users do, a refactor doesn't trigger a red build. The suite stays green because the experience stayed correct.

Code shipped this weekat agent speed

Tests shipped this weekby hand

320h/mo

QA time saved

> "We have replaced over 320h of manual testing every month with QA.tech."

Fredrik Seidl – CTO at Upsales

Upsales is a SaaS platform for CRM, marketing automation & Sales in B2B. ~150 employees.

[Read their story →](https://qa.tech/case-studies/how-upsales-replaced-320h-of-manual-testing-with-agents)

## Things your agent now controls.

Sixteen tools, designed to live alongside the other MCP servers in your editor. Cursor's tool budget is finite – every one of these earns its place.

start\_runlist\_runsget\_runcreate\_chatcreate\_test\_caselist\_application\_environmentsget\_environmentcreate\_remote\_tunnel\+ 8 more

### Run tests on demand

start\_runlist\_runsget\_run

Your agent triggers a full test plan after it ships a change – or just the 3 tests touching the file it edited. Results stream back into the chat.

> \>\_Run the checkout regression suite against the staging preview

### Create tests from chat

create\_chatcreate\_test\_case

Your agent describes a flow in plain English; QA.tech generates the test and adds it to your plan. Net new coverage with no test-author bottleneck.

> \>\_Add a test for the new SSO login path I just merged

### Manage environments

list\_application\_environmentsget\_environment

Switch which environment your tests run against – staging, preview, prod – without touching the app. Useful for ad-hoc PR-style validation.

> \>\_Run smoke tests against the preview URL Vercel just deployed

### Tunnel to local dev

create\_remote\_tunnel

Open a secure tunnel so QA.tech agents can test your local dev server. Validate a change before you even commit.

> \>\_Open a tunnel and run login against localhost:3000

## What happens when your agent calls QA.tech.

1.  01
    
    ### Your agent calls.
    
    Cursor, Claude Code, or any MCP client invokes one of QA.tech's 16 tools – start\_run, create\_chat, and others.
    
2.  02
    
    ### QA.tech does the work.
    
    Tests run, get created, or get queried in our secure cloud. No infrastructure on your side. Our agents test what users see, not the DOM they happen to render.
    
3.  03
    
    ### Results stream back.
    
    Pass/fail, screenshots, reasoning, links to full traces – delivered into the same chat your agent is in.
    

Works with

Web

Mobile web

iOS Apps

Android Apps

## Your team moves fast. Can your testing keep up?

QA.tech agents test your product autonomously, so moving fast never means shipping broken. See how it works in a 30-minute demo.

[Get a demo](https://qa.tech/demo?utm_source=mcp&utm_medium=product_page&utm_campaign=mcp_server)

## Frequently asked questions

Can't find what you're looking for? [Reach out](https://qa.tech/demo?utm_source=mcp&utm_medium=product_page&utm_campaign=mcp_server).

What is agentic testing, and how does MCP enable it?

Agentic testing is software testing run by AI agents that behave like real users – navigating the UI, exercising flows, validating outcomes – without anyone scripting selectors or maintaining brittle test code. The agent decides what to test, runs it, and reports back.  
  
MCP (Model Context Protocol) is the standard that lets those agents be called by other agents – including the coding agent in your editor. With QA.tech's MCP server, Cursor or Claude Code can trigger runs, create tests, and pull failure analysis directly. The agents see your UI the way users do, so tests stay green through refactors instead of breaking on every selector change.

How is this different from other testing tools with MCP?

Two real differences. First, our agents are vision-based. They test what users see, so a UI refactor doesn't trigger a red build – the suite stays green because the experience stayed correct. Most other platforms still use selector-based automation underneath; the MCP layer is new, the testing engine isn't. Second, our agents are designed from the ground up to operate in an agent workflow. The same testing surface that runs on a cron also runs from your coding agent's chat, with the same project knowledge and the same context. We're not retrofitting AI access onto a scripted-automation product. See the head-on [QA.tech vs Mabl](https://qa.tech/compare/qa-tech-vs-mabl) comparison.

How do I get access?

MCP access is rolled out hands-on with our team. Book a demo and we'll scope your setup, get you onboarded, and configure the right clients for your stack – Cursor, Claude Code, or any other MCP-compatible editor.

Does this need a separate plan or license?

No. If you have a QA.tech account, you have the MCP server. The same authentication, the same projects, the same runs.

What can the agent not do?

The agent can read your project, trigger runs, create tests, and manage environments. It cannot delete data, change billing, or modify users. We keep destructive actions behind the web app for now.

Is this secure?

Yes. Authentication is scoped per user; tool calls run with the same permissions as the user behind them. QA.tech is SOC 2 Type 2 compliant, and your data is never used to train models.

Latest changes: [MCP – Connect AI coding tools to QA.tech with one command](https://qa.tech/changelog/2026-05-26#mcp-configure-cli).

[QA.tech](https://qa.tech/)

SOC 2 Type 2 compliant

![Sensiba SOC 2 Type 2 compliant](https://qa.tech/assets/soc2-type2-badge-DPb1j9VX.png)

### Product

-   [Platform overview](https://qa.tech/product)
-   [AI QA Testing](https://qa.tech/ai-qa-testing)
-   [Web Testing](https://qa.tech/product/web-testing)
-   [Mobile Testing](https://qa.tech/product/mobile-testing)
-   [PR Testing](https://qa.tech/product/pr-testing)
-   [MCP](https://qa.tech/product/mcp)
-   [Use cases](https://qa.tech/use-cases)
-   [Changelog](https://qa.tech/changelog)

### Compare

-   [QA.tech vs Cypress](https://qa.tech/compare/qa-tech-vs-cypress)
-   [QA.tech vs Playwright](https://qa.tech/compare/qa-tech-vs-playwright)
-   [QA.tech vs Mabl](https://qa.tech/compare/qa-tech-vs-mabl)
-   [QA.tech vs QA Wolf](https://qa.tech/compare/qa-tech-vs-qa-wolf)
-   [AI vs Human QA](https://qa.tech/saas)

### Resources

-   [Docs](https://docs.qa.tech/)
-   [Blog](https://qa.tech/blog)
-   [Events](https://qa.tech/events)
-   [Pricing](https://qa.tech/pricing)
-   [Case Studies](https://qa.tech/case-studies)

### Company

-   [About](https://qa.tech/about-us)
-   [Partnerships](https://qa.tech/partnerships)
-   [Press](https://qa.tech/press)
-   [Contact Us](https://qa.tech/contact)
-   [Privacy Policy](https://qa.tech/privacy-policy)
-   [Terms of Service](https://trust.qa.tech/resources?s=mb9w4yjb03i3t8bjsq4jx3&name=main-agreement.pdf)
-   [Security & Compliance](https://trust.qa.tech/)

### Social

-   [](https://www.linkedin.com/company/qa-tech-ai/)
-   [](https://x.com/getqatech)
-   [](https://www.instagram.com/getqatech/)

© 2025 QA.tech. All rights reserved