hero-gradient

QA.tech vs Playwright

Explore how QA.tech stands out in the QA testing landscape as we compare our features directly with those of Playwright

QA.tech platform showing scenarios - E2E testing

An in depth comparision

Why QA.tech is the better alternative to Playwright

Comprehensive Test Discovery for QA Automation

Our platform, QA.tech, simplifies the process of identifying what needs to be tested in your web application. By thoroughly scanning your app’s functionality and user interactions, we automatically generate a detailed and relevant test suite designed to cover all critical scenarios.

Automated Test Case Creation

QA.tech takes the burden of manual test writing off your shoulders. Our platform automatically creates test cases based on the findings of the scan. These tests are written in easy-to-understand, natural language, making it simple for engineering, product, and QA teams to collaborate seamlessly on quality assurance efforts.

Advanced Bug Detection with AI-Driven Learning

Unlike traditional solutions like Playwright, which only tests predefined scenarios, QA.tech continuously evaluates your application in real time. Our AI-driven technology adapts and learns with every test cycle, increasing the probability of discovering new bugs over time.

Comprehensive Test Session Documentation

Every test session on QA.tech is thoroughly documented. We capture screenshots, network logs, console logs, and more, ensuring that reproducing bugs is as efficient as possible. With everything collected in one place, resolving issues becomes faster and more straightforward.

Browser-Based Testing for Realistic Results

All of our tests run on Chrome browsers to ensure real-world accuracy in your testing process. This gives you confidence that the results reflect true user experiences.

Seamless CI/CD Integration

QA.tech integrates effortlessly into your existing CI/CD pipelines, including popular platforms like GitHub Actions, CircleCI, and Jenkins. With minimal setup, our solution enhances your development workflow, ensuring that quality checks are continuous and automated.

Compare

The old way vs the new way

Writing and setting up traditional scripted tests can take 8-12 hours. QA.tech automates the process, runs tests in minutes and easily scales without adding extra headcount.

Features

QA.Tech

Playwright

Discovery of Tests

Resilient to Changes

Non-functional issues

% of bugs identified

95%

Only pass/fail - no bug detection

Handles changes

Integrates to your CI/CD

Bug reports in your ticket system

Supports any web framework

Time to create test cases

5 min

1 hour

Time to implement

5 min

20 h

1. Our study on AI vs Human QA (September 17, 2024).

Loved by developers

Easily reproduce bugs, get console and network logs and everything you need in one place.

Sigge Labor

CTO Leya

QA.tech is a glimpse into the future of engineering excellence. The potential it holds for automating and streamlining our testing processes is unprecedented.

Jacob Klapwijk

Developer StartupTools

Traditionally end-2-end tests require a relatively big amount of manual maintenance, while QA.tech's tests evolve automatically as the product is developed.´

Johan Lindholm

CTO Triggerbee

Getting started with QA.tech's tests is currently very easy, both to initiate a test suite and to integrate it with an existing CD/CI environment. QA.tech is very helpful if something needs to be fixed and works closely with us to develop a good product that suits us.

Maximilian Schön

CTO Solkoll.se

The fact that QA.tech acts more like a human and reasons about the UI offers more relevant feedback than having a robot instantly press a button that you told it to press.